Often the most effective flame retardant cables are halogenated as a outcome of both the insulation and outer Jacket are flame retardant but after we want Halogen Free cables we find it is usually only the outer jacket which is flame retardant and the internal insulation just isn’t.
This has significance as a end result of while cables with a flame retardant outer jacket will usually pass flame retardance tests with exterior flame, the identical cables when subjected to excessive overload or prolonged brief circuits have proved in university tests to be highly flammable and might even start a fireplace. This effect is understood and printed (8th International Conference on Insulated Power Cables (Jicable’11 – June 2011) held in Versailles, France) so it’s perhaps shocking that there aren’t any widespread check protocols for this seemingly widespread occasion and one cited by each authorities and media as explanation for building fires.
Further, in Flame Retardant check strategies corresponding to IEC60332 parts 1 & three which employ an external flame supply, the cable samples aren’t pre-conditioned to normal working temperature but examined at room temperature. This oversight is necessary particularly for power circuits as a end result of the temperature index of the cable (the temperature at which the cable material will self-support combustion in regular air) will be significantly affected by its starting temperature i.e.: The hotter the cable is, the extra easily it’ll propagate fire.
It would seem that a want exists to re-evaluate current cable flame retardance check methods as these are generally understood by consultants and shoppers alike to offer a dependable indication of a cables capability to retard the propagation of fire.
If we can’t trust the Standards what do we do?
In the USA many building standards do not require halogen free cables. Certainly this isn’t as a outcome of Americans usually are not properly informed of the risks; quite the strategy taken is that: “It is better to have extremely flame retardant cables which do not propagate hearth than minimally flame retardant cables which may spread a fire” – (a small hearth with some halogen could additionally be higher than a big fire without halogens). One of one of the best methods to make a cable insulation and cable jacket highly flame retardant is by using halogens.
Europe and many international locations all over the world adopt a unique mentality: Halogen Free and Flame Retardant. Whilst this is an admirable mandate the truth is quite different: Flame propagation exams for cables as adopted in UK and Europe can arguably be stated to be much less stringent than a number of the flame propagation exams for cables in USA leading to the conclusion that common tests in UK and Europe may merely be checks the cables can pass somewhat than tests the cables should cross.
Conclusion
For most flexible polymeric cables the choice remains right now between excessive flame propagation efficiency with halogens or lowered flame propagation efficiency with out halogens.
Enclosing cables in metal conduit will reduce propagation at the point of fireplace but hydrocarbon based combustion gasses from decomposing polymers are likely propagate through the conduits to switchboards, distribution boards and junction bins in different elements of the building. Any spark such because the opening or closing of circuit breakers, or contactors is likely to ignite the flamable gasses leading to explosion and spreading the hearth to another location.
While MICC (Mineral Insulated Metal Sheathed) cables would supply a solution, there could be often no singe good reply for every installation so designers want to gauge the required efficiency on a “project-by-project” basis to decide which technology is perfect.
The primary significance of fireplace load
Inside all buildings and projects electrical cables provide the connectivity which keeps lights on, air-conditioning working and the lifts running. pressure gauge octa powers computers, office equipment and provides the connection for our phone and computer systems. Even our cellphones want to connect with wireless or GSM antennas which are related to the telecom community by fiber optic or copper cables. Cables guarantee our security by connecting
fireplace alarms, emergency voice communication, CCTV, smoke shutters, air pressurization fans, emergency lighting, fire sprinkler pumps, smoke and warmth detectors, and so many different options of a contemporary Building Management System.
Where public security is important we frequently request cables to have added security features similar to flame retardance to make sure the cables don’t simply unfold hearth, circuit integrity throughout hearth so that important fire-fighting and life security gear keep working. Sometimes we might recognize that the combustion of electric cables produces smoke and this can be toxic so we name for cables to be Low Smoke and Halogen Free. Logically and intuitively we predict that by requesting these special properties the cables we buy and set up might be safer
Because cables are installed by many alternative trades for different functions and are principally hidden or embedded in our constructions, what is commonly not realized is that the various miles of cables and tons of plastic polymers which make up the cables can symbolize one of many biggest fire loads in the building. This level is actually price thinking more about.
PVC, XLPE, EPR, CSP, LSOH (Low Smoke Zero Halogen) and even HFFR (Halogen Free Flame Retardant) cable supplies are mostly based mostly on hydrocarbon polymers. These base materials aren’t typically flame retardant and naturally have a high hearth load. Cable manufacturers make them flame retardant by adding compounds and chemical substances. Certainly this improves the volatility of burning but the fuel content of the base polymers stays.
Tables 1 and a pair of above evaluate the fireplace load in MJ/Kg for common cable insulating supplies in opposition to some common fuels. The Heat Release Rate and volatility in air for these supplies will differ however the fuel added to a fireplace per kilogram and the consequential quantity of heat generated and oxygen consumed is relative.
The volume in kilometers and tons of cables installed in our buildings and the related fireplace load of the insulations is appreciable. This is particularly important in tasks with lengthy egress times like high rise, public buildings, tunnels and underground environments, airports, hospitals and so forth.
When considering hearth security we must first perceive the most important factors. Fire experts tell us most fireplace related deaths in buildings are attributable to smoke inhalation, temperature rise and oxygen depletion or by trauma attributable to leaping in attempting to escape these effects.
Smoke
The first and most important side of smoke is how a lot smoke? Typically the bigger the fire the more smoke is generated so something we will do to reduce the unfold of fireplace may even correspondingly reduce the amount of smoke.
Smoke will contain particulates of carbon, ash and other solids, liquids and gasses, many are toxic and flamable. In particular, fires in confined areas like buildings, tunnels and underground environments trigger oxygen levels to drop, this contributes to incomplete burning and smoldering which produces increased quantities of smoke and toxic byproducts including CO and CO2. Presence of halogenated supplies will launch toxic Halides like Hydrogen Chloride along with many different toxic and flammable gasses within the smoke.
For this reason common smoke exams carried out on cable insulation materials in massive 3 meter3 chambers with plenty of air can present misleading smoke figures as a result of full burning will typically release significantly much less smoke than partial incomplete burning which is likely in apply. Simply specifying digital pressure gauge with a defined obscuration worth then pondering it will provide a low smoke setting throughout hearth may sadly be little of help for the individuals really involved.
Halogens, Toxicity, Fuel Element, Oxygen Depletion and Temperature Rise
It is concerning that Europe and other international locations undertake the concept of halogen free materials without correctly addressing the topic of toxicity. Halogens launched during combustion are extraordinarily toxic but so too is carbon monoxide and this isn’t a halogen gasoline. It is frequent to call for halogen free cables and then permit the usage of Polyethylene because it is halogen free. Burning Polyethylene (which may be seen from the table above has the very best MJ gasoline load per Kg of all insulations) will generate almost three times more heat than an equivalent PVC cable. This means is that burning polyethylene will not only generate almost 3 times more warmth but in addition eat almost three occasions extra oxygen and produce considerably extra carbon monoxide. Given carbon monoxide is liable for most toxicity deaths in fires this case is at finest alarming!
The gasoline parts proven in the table above indicate the quantity of heat which will be generated by burning 1kg of the widespread cable insulations tabled. Certainly this heat will speed up the burning of other adjacent supplies and may help unfold the fire in a building but importantly, to be able to generate the warmth power, oxygen needs to be consumed. The greater the heat of combustion the more oxygen is required, so by selecting insulations with high gas elements is adding significantly to no less than four of the primary dangers of fires: Temperature Rise, Oxygen Depletion, Flame Spread and Carbon Monoxide Release.
Perhaps it’s best to install polymeric cables inside metallic conduits. This will certainly help flame spread and reduce smoke because inside the conduit oxygen is restricted; however this isn’t a solution. As said beforehand, many of the gasses from the decomposing polymeric insulations contained in the conduits are highly flammable and toxic. These gases will migrate alongside the conduits to junction bins, swap panels, distribution boards, motor management centers, lamps, switches, and so on. On coming into the gases can ignite or explode with any arcing such because the make/break of a circuit breaker, contactor, swap or relay inflicting the hearth to spread to another location.
Conclusion
The popularity of “Halogen Free” whereas ignoring the other poisonous parts of fireside is a transparent admission we don’t understand the topic properly nor can we simply define the dangers of combined toxic parts or human physiological response to them. It is essential however, that we do not continue to design with only half an understanding of the problem. While no excellent resolution exists for organic based cables, we will definitely minimize these critically necessary effects of fireside danger:
One choice maybe to decide on cable insulations and jacket supplies that are halogen free and have a low gas element, then set up them in steel conduit or perhaps the American approach is best: to make use of highly halogenated insulations in order that in case of fireside any flame spread is minimized.
For most power, control, communication and knowledge circuits there’s one full resolution obtainable for all the issues raised in this paper. It is an answer which has been used reliably for over 80 years. MICC cables can present a complete and full answer to all the issues related to the fireplace security of natural polymer cables.
The copper jacket, magnesium oxide insulation and copper conductors of MICC ensure the cable is successfully fire proof. MICC cables haven’t any organic content so merely cannot propagate flame or generate any smoke. The zero fuel load ensures no warmth is added and no oxygen is consumed.
Being inorganic MICC cables can not generate any halogen or toxic gasses in any respect including CO.
Unfortunately many common cable fire check methods used today may inadvertently mislead people into believing the polymeric versatile cable merchandise they buy and use will perform as expected in all fireplace conditions. As outlined in this paper, sadly this is most likely not correct.
For extra information, go to www.temperature-house.com
Share